<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Watched WaterWorld</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alex.mamchenkov.net/2005/05/18/watched-waterworld/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alex.mamchenkov.net/2005/05/18/watched-waterworld/</link>
	<description>... mammoth cave ...</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 11:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Mamchenkov</title>
		<link>http://alex.mamchenkov.net/2005/05/18/watched-waterworld/#comment-37895</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander Mamchenkov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 07:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alex.mamtchenkov.net/2005/05/18/watched-waterworld/#comment-37895</guid>
		<description>The whole story assumes a kind of a fiction, so I just couldn't watch it seriously )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The whole story assumes a kind of a fiction, so I just couldn&#8217;t watch it seriously )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: glenn</title>
		<link>http://alex.mamchenkov.net/2005/05/18/watched-waterworld/#comment-37875</link>
		<dc:creator>glenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 15:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alex.mamtchenkov.net/2005/05/18/watched-waterworld/#comment-37875</guid>
		<description>WaterWorld had its faults 
(like all of that fresh steel used to build the floating "atoll"- in salt water? I don't think so...!!)(like the wizard with that massive telescope... he wouldn't be able to see ANYTHING AT ALL with it bobbing up and down constantly!)
(like the airship-balloon...-that was about 20 times too small to begin with...that ACTUALLY drifted over the single speck of Dry Land -try to calculate those odds!) 
If you viewed it with a critical eye it was mostly impossible...
BUT if you viewed it like it was a comic-book with comic-book heroes and villians it was good. There were great action sequences, it was funny, there was human interest, and I loved that boat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WaterWorld had its faults<br />
(like all of that fresh steel used to build the floating &#8220;atoll&#8221;- in salt water? I don&#8217;t think so&#8230;!!)(like the wizard with that massive telescope&#8230; he wouldn&#8217;t be able to see ANYTHING AT ALL with it bobbing up and down constantly!)<br />
(like the airship-balloon&#8230;-that was about 20 times too small to begin with&#8230;that ACTUALLY drifted over the single speck of Dry Land -try to calculate those odds!)<br />
If you viewed it with a critical eye it was mostly impossible&#8230;<br />
BUT if you viewed it like it was a comic-book with comic-book heroes and villians it was good. There were great action sequences, it was funny, there was human interest, and I loved that boat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
